Author Topic: Did Jeff Sessions Just Increase the Odds Congress Will Make Marijuana Legal?  (Read 456 times)

orthene

  • Administrator
  • TGL XxSpaceLordxX
  • *****
  • Posts: 3321
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/06/jeff-sessions-marijuana-legalization-congress-216251?lo=ap_a1
 
The attorney general has created intolerable uncertainty for a growing industry that is now demanding legal protections from Congress. And lawmakers are listening.
 
When Jeff Sessions announced Thursday morning he had removed the barrier that had held back federal prosecutors from pursuing marijuana cases in states that had made pot legal, he delivered on something he had all but promised when he was nominated as attorney general. Most of the marijuana world saw it coming, but they freaked out anyway.

A fund of marijuana-based stocks dropped more than 9 percent in value and, as a sign of how mainstream marijuana has become, Sessions’ decision to repeal the Cole Memo, an Obama-era protection for states that have legalized marijuana, even affected the stock price of Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, which dropped more than 5 percent. Business leaders in an industry that was worth $7.9 billion in 2017, called Sessions’ action revoking “outrageous” and “economically stupid.”

Capitol Hill screamed just as loudly. And it wasn’t just the Democratic members of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus. It was Republican senators, too. Cory Gardner of Colorado took the Senate floor to issue an ultimatum to Sessions: “I will be putting a hold on every single nomination from the Department of Justice until Attorney General Jeff Sessions lives up to the commitment he made to me in my pre-confirmation meeting with him. The conversation we had that was specifically about this issue of states’ rights in Colorado. Until he lives up to that commitment, I’ll be holding up all nominations of the Department of Justice,” Gardner said. “The people of Colorado deserve answers. The people of Colorado deserve to be respected.” Gardner is no fringe Republican; he’s the chair of the NRSC.

Even members who had been silent on the issue in the past vowed to squeeze the Department of Justice’s budget. Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat from New Hampshire, reminding reporters she’s the lead Democrat on the Department of Justice funding subcommittee, tweeted: “I’ll work to ensure that resources are devoted to opioid response NOT foolish policy of interfering with legal marijuana production.” Most of the Congressional leadership was silent on this issue, but not House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who issued a blistering statement against Sessions, saying that she would push for an amendment in the new spending bill to protect states that had legalized not just medical marijuana but recreational use too, a move that could make ongoing budget negotiations much more tense.

Thursday may well turn out to be a pivotal moment in the marijuana industry’s evolution as a political force. Nearly 70 percent of Americans believe in some form of legalized marijuana, but does the nascent industry have the sway to rewrite nearly 50 years of federal drug policy? Or will it remain a splintered coalition of investors, libertarians, concerned parents of sick kids, cancer sufferers, and traumatized veterans, who have the numbers but not the concentrated lobbying effort necessary to once and for all remove marijuana from the crosshairs of federal drug enforcement?

“There’s a lot of [legislators] trying to have it both ways who are now going to have to make up their mind,” said Tick Segerblom, the Nevada state senator who is considered the father of the state’s legalization movement. “Are they going to go with what the voters of their state support, or are they going to join Sessions and crack down and try to re-instate prohibition?”

Right now, the answer seems to be the former. Sessions’ antipathy for a drug that has lost much of its stigma among a wide cross section of Americans has only galvanized disparate factions in Congress to protect an industry that is expected to generate $2.3 billion in state tax revenue by 2020.

Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont, who just a few weeks ago declined to comment to POLITICO Magazine about whether he would work to maintain protections for medical marijuana in the 2018 omnibus spending package, tweeted on Thursday, “I'm now fighting to include my amdt in the final omnibus Approps bill so we can protect patients and law-abiding businesses.

This is only about half the article. Linky up top^^
Sail and grow
Deep inside
The brave align
Green we stay

-Boss Keloid Lung Valley

jones

  • Global Moderator
  • TGL XxSpaceLordxX
  • *****
  • Posts: 4881
I'm so glad to see all these lawmakers come together on this subject

3V1L9371U5

  • TGL OverLord
  • TGL XxElitexX
  • **********
  • Posts: 1703
No shit.  Never thought we'd see the day when a bunch of lawmakers got their panties in a bunch because they WANTED legal pot, right?

Rod Serling eat your heart out, 'cos the Twilight Zone got nothing on this!  :wacked:

Ozone

  • TGL Elite
  • TGL Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 674
No shit.  Never thought we'd see the day when a bunch of lawmakers got their panties in a bunch because they WANTED legal pot, right?

Rod Serling eat your heart out, 'cos the Twilight Zone got nothing on this!  :wacked:



In a lot of ways I think the conflict is what illusion is more profitable at this point (Although personally I'd say the whole thing is a dog and pony show to save face and ease legislative transition). Some folks realized it's way more profitable (in more ways than just $) to have marijuana legalized than to have it deemed illegal. So, to come back to Zappa's quote, the illusion isn't being removed for a 'higher degree of truth/reality' but instead for a more profitable illusion.

"Although you come with saws and axes, in the end I shall grow over your graves."

jones

  • Global Moderator
  • TGL XxSpaceLordxX
  • *****
  • Posts: 4881
No shit.  Never thought we'd see the day when a bunch of lawmakers got their panties in a bunch because they WANTED legal pot, right?

Rod Serling eat your heart out, 'cos the Twilight Zone got nothing on this!  :wacked:



In a lot of ways I think the conflict is what illusion is more profitable at this point (Although personally I'd say the whole thing is a dog and pony show to save face and ease legislative transition). Some folks realized it's way more profitable (in more ways than just $) to have marijuana legalized than to have it deemed illegal. So, to come back to Zappa's quote, the illusion isn't being removed for a 'higher degree of truth/reality' but instead for a more profitable illusion.




I was thinking-- why bother to enslave people who willingly enslave themselves
for a few pieces of paper with the right numbers on them ($$$)
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 06:36:25 PM by jones »

Uruk-High

  • TGL Elite
  • TGL XxElitexX
  • ******
  • Posts: 2720
“There’s a lot of [legislators] trying to have it both ways who are now going to have to make up their mind,”

This right here is the core of the issue. No more we'll just look the other way for now at the federal level BS. Love him or hate him (does anybody really love him? :snoop:), Sessions is simply trying to enforce federal law, which is his job. Don't like the federal law, then its friggin time to change it! MJ will never be free as long as we play this BS game. Screw the state's rights BS, it's time to make MJ legal at the federal level!

Free da weed!

 :weedspin :weedspin :weedspin

jimijams

  • TGL Legacy Member
  • TGL Shaman
  • *****
  • Posts: 213
I TOTALLY CONCUR  !ITS TIME

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal